Research Forum
Forum breadcrumbs - You are here:Dr. Garrett Smith's Research ForumConditions / Diseases / Syndromes caused by Poison/"Vitamin A"Broken logic: xerophthalmia (dry …
You need to log in to create posts and topics.
Broken logic: xerophthalmia (dry eye) is said to be a Vitamin A deficiency, yet most who have it aren't Vitamin A deficient?
Dr. Garrett Smith@cscsatc
533 Posts
#1 · November 21, 2018, 1:01 pm
Quote from Dr. Garrett Smith on November 21, 2018, 1:01 pmSo, your daily dose of how you've been sold a lie about Poison/"Vitamin A" being a good thing, when the research on it is mostly biased garbage and statements about it make NO sense. To wit:Here is the main thing that comes up under a Google search for xeropthalmia (aka dry eye disease, DED):https://www.google.com/search?q=xerophthalmia&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-b-1-ab"xe·roph·thal·mi·a: abnormal dryness of the conjunctiva and cornea of the eye, with inflammation and ridge formation, typically associated with vitamin A deficiency."The first link under that definition says this in the first line:https://www.healthline.com/health/eye-health/xerophthalmia"Xerophthalmia is a progressive eye disease caused by vitamin A deficiency. Lack of vitamin A can dry out your tear ducts and eyes."This implies a pretty strong association, right? I'd say so. We should ASSume that this condition would be associated with LOW blood levels of Poison/"Vitamin A" then, right?From the "The American Journal of Managed Care", an article titled "Management of Dry Eye" by Michael A. Lemp, MD:https://www.ajmc.com/journals/supplement/2008/2008-04-vol14-n3suppl/apr08-3142ps088-s101?p=4"Vitamin A deficiency is a known cause of xerophthalmia; however, most DED patients are not vitamin A–deficient."This is NOT nutritional science folks. A deficiency is a cause of a problem where there is NO deficiency to be found? Let's go with something more scientific.
DHA is the main natural ligand (binder) of the improperly-named Retinoic Acid Receptor (RXR), I have a post on this. Funny thing:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27138739"Metabolic deficiency of ω-3 [omega-3, which includes DHA] tear film lipids may be a driver of chronic ocular surface inflammation in DE [dry eye]."DHA deficiency in the eye is being misdiagnosed as a Vitamin A deficiency, the first one (DHA) is necessary, the second one (Poison/"Vitamin A") coincidentally stimulates the same receptor (so can induce similar effects/benefits while also being a poison).Benefits of DHA on dry eye here:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30104626
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27817918
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4165511/It would seem we found the cause and solution. I do not believe DHA supplementation is necessary in an adequate diet. I do believe also that removing the Poison/"Vitamin A" will free up the receptors from excess Poison/"Vitamin A" and allow less DHA to do a better job (better efficiency and effectiveness).
So, your daily dose of how you've been sold a lie about Poison/"Vitamin A" being a good thing, when the research on it is mostly biased garbage and statements about it make NO sense. To wit:
Here is the main thing that comes up under a Google search for xeropthalmia (aka dry eye disease, DED):
"xe·roph·thal·mi·a: abnormal dryness of the conjunctiva and cornea of the eye, with inflammation and ridge formation, typically associated with vitamin A deficiency."
The first link under that definition says this in the first line:
"Xerophthalmia is a progressive eye disease caused by vitamin A deficiency. Lack of vitamin A can dry out your tear ducts and eyes."
This implies a pretty strong association, right? I'd say so. We should ASSume that this condition would be associated with LOW blood levels of Poison/"Vitamin A" then, right?
From the "The American Journal of Managed Care", an article titled "Management of Dry Eye" by Michael A. Lemp, MD:
"Vitamin A deficiency is a known cause of xerophthalmia; however, most DED patients are not vitamin A–deficient."
This is NOT nutritional science folks. A deficiency is a cause of a problem where there is NO deficiency to be found? Let's go with something more scientific.
DHA is the main natural ligand (binder) of the improperly-named Retinoic Acid Receptor (RXR), I have a post on this. Funny thing:
"Metabolic deficiency of ω-3 [omega-3, which includes DHA] tear film lipids may be a driver of chronic ocular surface inflammation in DE [dry eye]."
DHA deficiency in the eye is being misdiagnosed as a Vitamin A deficiency, the first one (DHA) is necessary, the second one (Poison/"Vitamin A") coincidentally stimulates the same receptor (so can induce similar effects/benefits while also being a poison).
Benefits of DHA on dry eye here:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30104626
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27817918
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4165511/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27817918
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4165511/
It would seem we found the cause and solution. I do not believe DHA supplementation is necessary in an adequate diet. I do believe also that removing the Poison/"Vitamin A" will free up the receptors from excess Poison/"Vitamin A" and allow less DHA to do a better job (better efficiency and effectiveness).
Click for thumbs down.0Click for thumbs up.0
Last edited on November 21, 2018, 1:17 pm by Dr. Garrett Smith
Dr. Garrett Smith, the "Nutrition Detective"
Licensed Naturopathic Physician (NMD) in Arizona
NutritionDetective.com, home of the Love Your Liver program
YouTube - FaceBook - Instagram - Twitter
Licensed Naturopathic Physician (NMD) in Arizona
NutritionDetective.com, home of the Love Your Liver program
YouTube - FaceBook - Instagram - Twitter